Agenda item

Public Space Protection Orders

Briefing Note of Director of Streetscene and Regulatory Services

Minutes:

The Committee considered a Briefing Note, together with a comprehensive presentation at the meeting, which detailed the use and enforcement of Public Space Protection Orders (PSPO’s) in the City. Councillors J O’Boyle and D Welsh, St Michael’s Ward Councillor attended the meeting at the invitation of the Chair. 

 

The Briefing Note indicated that PSPO’s were created as part of the 2014 Anti Social Behaviour (ASB), Crime and Policing Act, and operate for spaces in the same way that injunctions work against people. When a PSPO is created it can define what behaviours or activities are permitted or prohibited within a defined area. There are currently 5 PSPO’s operational in the City, addressing issues such as public alcohol consumption and off road bikes, as well as localised issues that are deemed to affect specific areas such as Edgwick Park or the City.

 

PSPO’s can be enforced by Police and Council officers.  These powers can be delegated to other agencies but that has not been done in Coventry. Under the legislation a simple breach of a PSPO leaves some liable to be issued with a Fixed Penalty Notice (FPN) that can cost £100 or £60 if paid within 14 days. In Coventry, “breach notices” are issued when someone doesn’t comply with a PSPO.  This means there is not an obvious confrontation at the point of issuance and allows the offence and the individual to be triaged to decide on the appropriate course of action.  The appropriate action may be the issuing of a FPN, a referral to a support agency or a summons to court, it will depend on the circumstances.

 

Where it is the Council that enforces the PSPO’s, it is carried out by Neighbourhood Enforcement Officers (NEO’s) These officers carry out a wide range of duties across the whole City including investigating fly tipping and other environmental issues, amongst other duties. The Council only have a finite number of NEO’s and as such, where they are allocated and on what duties they are tasked to carry out, will have an impact on PSPO enforcement.  Recently NEO’s have been prioritising fly tipping in targeted areas.

 

The Briefing Note indicated that the idea that people’s behaviour always needs to be “enforced” needs to be challenged. Technically enforcement only occurs when you have to rely upon legislation to get someone to comply with your instructions.  If someone modifies their behaviour as requested, then it’s usually not appropriate to enforce.

 

Police look to use what they refer to as “The 5 E’s” when they interact with the public. These are:

  Engage,

  Educate

  Encourage

  Enforcement

  Evaluate

 

In light of the above, any review of enforcement statistics needs to be caveated so that people aren’t unduly concerned if figures are lower than they might expect.  This could reflect that officers are good at encouraging people to act in a suitable manner without needing to formally use the PSPO powers.

 

The St Michaels PSPO was introduced a number of years ago and allows officers to disperse a gathering of two or more people if conditions are met Elected members recognised the civil liberty ramifications of such an order and requested data regarding its usage.  This presented a number of operational challenges for Police officers as to how they would compile this information and how it would be recorded.  At the time it wasn’t possible to give precise information, only anecdotal.  Police and Council officers have worked collaboratively to address this and recently the Police have added an extra function to the phone app that officers use to allow for recording, in real time of the times they enforce PSPO powers. For the reasons outlined above, all stats have to be caveated to say that officers may have not needed to use the powers to achieve desired outcomes, so smaller numbers of enforcement does not mean behaviours are not being addressed, but in future, when they do enforce it will be recorded and this information will be available.

 

The Committee asked questions, sought assurances and made comments on a number of issues including:-

 

  Ensuring there are enough resources in place to enforce, where required, PSPOs

  Data relating to where and why breaches of PSPO have been issued. It was noted that there was an evaluation report of PSPOs

  Staffing levels and deployment of staff

  Work being undertaken collaboratively by a number of agencies to address issues such as begging in the City Centre

  How money generated from the fines are used to in the service area for purposes such as deployment of CCTV cameras

  The types of CCTV cameras operating in the City and how they are best used

  The unique issues and challenges experienced in St Michael’s Ward and the impact that criminal activity and anti social behaviour in the Ward has on residents, including the level of perceived “tolerated” behaviour in the area

  An increase in the number of bikes (including electric bikes) riding on pavements and pedestrian areas; the significant safety concerns associated with this; and the lack of national legislation in relation to e bikes.

  The Committee noted that the Cabinet Member for City Services is currently looking at action to be taken in relation to e bikes to address the concerns now raised, particularly in relation to the delivery of food

  Training required to be given to NEO’s to enable them, to carry out their enforcement role successfully and safely

  An understanding of the regular collaborative work being taken by the Council and Police

  Work that can be taken under PSPOs in relation to arson and fires caused by disposal bbq’s in parks

  Issues associated with off road bikes and work being undertaken by the Police in relation to this matter

  Engagement with communities and multi faith groups in relation to the operation of PSPO’s

  How Magistrates deal with breaches of PSPO’s

 

The Committee expressed their support for the introduction of recording data relating to PSPO’s on the Police app.

 

RESOLVED that the Scrutiny Co-ordination Committee:-

 

1)  Requests that officers:-

 

a)  Investigate and consider strengthening PSPOs to include arson

b)  Provide information on where and why PSPOs have been issued

c)  Share the PSPO evaluation report with the Committee

 

2)  Recommends that the Cabinet Member for Policing and Equalities writes to the Local Government Association regarding the introduction of appropriate legislation around e bikes

 

3)  Express their support for the work currently being undertaken by the Cabinet Member for City Services in relation to e bikes

 

 

Supporting documents: